

- World of tanks vs world of tanks blitz for android#
- World of tanks vs world of tanks blitz android#
- World of tanks vs world of tanks blitz Pc#
But a skilled player in both games can use their maneuverability to make them hard to hit, while raining down return shots.Īs you delve deeper into the game, that "bite-sized" tilt becomes more and more apparent. Light tanks ought just to be quick snacks for their bigger siblings. One thing both games share is a determination to make the little guy fun to play. You can't aim to shoot the tracks off the opposition to leave them sitting ducks.
World of tanks vs world of tanks blitz android#
There's no real armour or damage modelling in the Android game, so rear shots don't seem more effective than front shots. That's what we set out to deliver with Company of Tanks." Especially on mobile a lot of people are looking for a quick, bite-sized, fun experience.

"Many historically themed games seem to focus too much on accuracy when fun and gameplay should be the main priority," he said. But deep down, I know it's not something that's important in games. That irks me, because tanks are something that interest me. While the more limited roster in CoT picks from the same pool, they look far less realistic on screen. Its iOS counterpart has impressively realistic models for a range of real fighting vehicles. While neither game claims to be a simulation, the level of historical modelling is also much lower in Company of Tanks. The edges of buildings disappear as you skirt them, and tanks get stuck in gaps they ought to fit through. When you've played for a while, though, you notice clipping problems. Maps looks good enough at first and the game feels smooth, even if it makes my Android phone a little too hot for comfort. They have a striking, slightly cartoonish look about them. Perhaps inevitably, the game lacks the high level of polish you see in Wargames's adaptation - especially in the visuals. And while a solo deathmatch can be satisfying one-on-one, playing a team game with two per side feels a bit sparse. There don't seem to be anywhere near as many people playing CoT, so opposition can be a bit sparse. Whereas the focus for Blitz is on team battles, CoT offers both team and solo deathmatches, and tilts toward the latter. The way the games are different becomes noticeable as soon as you've passed the simple tutorial for Company of Tanks. So Critical Force are, in fact, the pioneers on mobile territory. That's six months before Wargaming stomped onto the app store.
World of tanks vs world of tanks blitz for android#
However, he was at pains to point out that Company of Tanks came out for Android and Windows Phone in December 2013. We're in the business of making quality multi-player shooters on mobile, so this was right up our alley." "The demand was high and at the time there were no quality games around in this area.
World of tanks vs world of tanks blitz Pc#
" World of Tanks on PC made us realize that there was a huge gap in the market on the mobile platforms for tank-related shooter games," he told us. Tim Spaninks, the lead designer at studio Critical Force Entertainment was similarly forthcoming. The core offering being online multi-player tank battles with upgradable, unlockable vehicles. And it's made me question my assumptions as to why Blitz made such a splash on the App Store.īut first, let's take a look at the game itself. They look pretty similar on the surface, but the play experience on each is quite distinct. Having played both side by side, it's fascinating how the same source material resulted in such different titles. And one of the better candidates is Company of Tanks. Luckily, for Android gamers, that legion of mimics is still out there to delve into. Now, of course, Wargaming has provided us with the real deal in the form of World of Tanks: Blitz. So, like green shoots breaking up the concrete of an abandoned parking lot, the success of World of Tanks on PC ensured that similar games would arrive for mobile.
